It so happens that some odd looking numbers actually create a desired result, then, 'Bonus !'.Ĭan one be justly criticised who, having an undoubted talent for creating elegant models,Ĭhooses to use one of the FDM's over another and honestly delares their intention? Surely Guide again, the numbers aren't cast in stone, the resulting behaviour is what's important. If not, then we have the good fortune to arrive by a different route, a solver that createsĪn FDM by heuristically running alternatives until a satisfactory output results. If you're clever or fortunate enough to locate those exact input One version of our simulator depends on the modellerĮxactly pinpointing in that multi dimensional space the input set that will definitivelyĭetermine the output. In either of our FDMs a simulation response is created from a multi-variable set of parameters. Not look at some numbers in a configuration, but opined that it felt right after trying it out. Much as I suspect the AE did with the c172, Get in the thing and take the 'plane' for a spin. Is paramount: you don't criticize a full scale sim because it's a box on hyraulic pistons, you The idea is, it must appear to behave as does reality, the word appear My reaction was to be so much in awe of their work quality that for five years I've endeavored to make the YASim sFDM process more intuiutive and accessible. Read the whole of Gary Neely's YASim guide and appreciate how much work went into helping other people make their own product better do that before posting some facile graph depicting a winner and a loser that acheives little but insult that work. So my opinion is, read the source code, it's about the best commented I've seen in decades of fixing other people's code. Occupation isn't 'Something to do with Com-puters', that's how it works, right ? I'm a Computer Scientist so my opinion is worth ten thousand of anybody else's whose The same peole, maybe using different names, go ad hominem ad infinitum with nothingĬonstructive to say in a Rockem Brockem slugfest ? Is this really the best we can show the world for this project ? That being said, the SR 71 continues to evolve whether Monsignor likes it or not. Whether it displeases Thorsten is irrelevant here. To create an SR 71 Yasim is to give others the opportunity to modify, improve and evolve YASim. Of course YASIm can't do transonic, so that prevents me from wanting to do an SR 71 model? No, sorry. (Thanks to Maik Justus for the FDM and the Nasal code). It takes off vertically, the engines tilt etc. YASIM cannot and will never be able to simulate a V22. This is also Open Source.Īs for the rest, I have already heard this type of remark when I started in the V22 Osprey. and with a logical and normal behavior before deciding to place it on FGAddon and in my hangar at the disposal users. Of course I prefer a plane pleasant to fly with an FDM corresponding to its size and its mass, its maximum speed etc. I only want an accessible and fun FDM for my planes". I already know that yasim is not capable of simulating transonic and supersonic effects realistically, but I don't want realism. Really.īut in this case maybe you should have better written to Thorsten: "Thank you Thorsten for your remarks. Instead you want an accessible and fun FDM. Amue wrote in Wed 10:50 pm:Ok, I think now I understand.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |